1. first briefly Play “Adventure” in “the Interactive Fiction” 1970s designation of the html CD. Also try getting there from file:///Volumes/NewMediaReader/1970s/IF/index.html
2. Have a significantly more thorough engagement with “Galatea” in the CD that comes with Hayles Electronic Literature ELC Vol. One/For_Mac/Galatea.z8
3. Read mez's Directory.Linking 2: /The Immersive State of Reality[Game]Play @ http://www.hz-journal.org/n7/mez.html
5. Review the website for the Path http://grandmothers-house.net/ and play: the path prologue at http://grandmothers-house.net/and-stay-on-the-path/
Recommended:
6. Explore this Blog:http://grandtextauto.org/
they never a were off
those yaers he make a grand World' tune
saynig Tiger to no to
journlaists when joined Eldrick golf
The Frot or mayn watching Hell.
instant
Eever his golfer
Tiger owe the gmae
(most times)
to nothing But Tiger
an repaet: kept him
Yes, all owe the
and be to shredded Woth
same
he wehn and heradled his wife, evre.
The have And desire ask they?
canceled was maybe how momma, daddy, accounts
tehir on is even
child porn be marriage
news mian hard Texas
'Im affairs, Yah, report face.
gofl behavior
He aksed about girls
crush time
Every every our individuals return
via undoubtedly return
27 cheat me
Tiger exopund his cocktail
no.
We being to has No.
Darren:
Jonathan:
Labels: Assignment 1: Conceptual/
New media art and literature can often become a celebration of a successful feat of engineering, but beyond the basic look what we can do with words, there has to be some notion of address: language must be setting out to do something, not sit in a vacuum (a sense, ironically, reified by the very novelty of the unconventional machine), a marker for that part where language could be used were one to want to say or do something.
However, I’d like to argue that one cannot simply say that the word is another element to be treated like a sound or a color if one is to do justice to the notion of language as a very specific ability that humans possess, one that has been shaped by the sediments of conventions and conversations layered over several centuries.2. About the reduction of Language:
Each field carries an evocative meaning force. Our embodied history of experience of past contexts represents another expansive field that is brought into this delicate equation. As we encounter virtual or computational spaces we experience an ongoing, time-based summing of meaning forces. Thus text presents one field of meaning force that can only be understood contextually in relation to other neighboring meaning forces--other media elements and living processes. The word is not valued in a hierarchy over other media elements.a. One possible consideration when thinking about the juxtaposition of language in space:
“Democracy, for instance, is a context in which one’s understanding of justice exists (or upon which it is contingent) - justice itself being a term that has existed throughout history, even in times not characterized at all by a democratic ethos. But the word justice contrasted with the words fish fry only serves to make the two words more material - more present as words in a physical environment - but also to render both relatively mute, and entirely banal, in terms of meaning.”
It doesn’t appear to be of great import to new media writers, especially those involved in interactivity, 3D spaces and multimedia, that they might actually utilize the technology to magnify the impact and specificity of language as we have come to know it through the centuries. Rather, the tendency has been to reduce or evaporate this impact for the sake of something else - experience of language in space or time, for example, or of language as some sort of ambient experience, or, in this case, of language as a participant in a recombinant universe jointly occupied by sounds, images, videos and the user’s interactions. Because new media writers tend to program their pieces from the ground up, creating their own interfaces entirely dissimilar to conventional interfaces - the Web browser, for example, where millions of people get their electronic writing - the tendency seems to be to use text that itself has no trace of conventional communication, and then to call it poetry because it is clearly not anything else. There is nothing wrong with this, of course - poetry likes the company - but is it possible to achieve any of the above without having to reduce language to a useful marker for the passing of time, or as a way to keep one’s balance in a 3D space?3. Mindful intention of text
This brings me to my second point, which involves a consideration of whether, in works of electronic writing, text is being used to solve a problem tossed up by the formal issues of the art piece, or whether the art piece has been created to extend or expand our understanding of words and language.a. have a look at Camille Utterback's site
The most writerly aspect to much electronic writing, and by extension electronic art, can be the interface itself, which raises the possibility that a realm of electronic writing can exist that does not involve letterforms at all.5. Must digital literature be constrained by certain qualities of text to generate the optimum meaning?
http://claire.pcriot.com/homeagain/ (scroll bar as aspect of writing/reading)
Matt Gorbet, in his response to Utterback’s essay, observes that her examples share another similarity in the nature of the text they present: they employ short forms of text such as poetry, quotations, and symbols. Such texts are effective because they can be quickly grasped and have immediate impact, allowing visitors to start reading anywhere and spend as much or as little time as they like with the piece.
Given these observations about the simplicity of interaction and the brevity of content, a question presents itself: using a simple, familiar physical interaction which maintains the users’ sense of control, how far can the complexity of the content be pushed? Is there a necessary correlation between simple interaction and simple content? Or is it possible to create a body-centric interactive piece with the storytelling capacity of an epic novel or a play?